Without Yao, Rockets lose big game to Jazz
January 27th, 2008by John
Yao Ming is shown here in the Rockets’ locker room ill from an upper respiratory infection that kept him from playing against the Utah Jazz Sunday night. Without Yao, the Rockets struggled against the Jazz and lost 97-89.There may have been a lot of debate a couple of weeks ago if the Rockets were better off without Tracy McGrady when the Rockets won more games than they lost when he was out with an injury. However, there is absolutely no way that discussion has any merit when it comes to Yao Ming being out, as Rocket fans saw Sunday night against the Utah Jazz.
Yao had to be scratched from the game because of his battle with an upper respiratory infection, and as optimistic you wanted to be that the Rockets could still win without him, it was clear they missed his 23 points and defensive presence in the lane.
Yao is as tough as they come, having played with a similar kind of ailment earlier this season, so you know he had to be really feeling like crap not to play in such a big game since the Rockets are right behind the Jazz trying to get into the playoffs.
This game came down to the Rockets’ main bugaboo this season – the fourth quarter. I knew early on in the fourth when the Rockets couldn’t stop the Jazz that the trend would continue. It reminded me too much of last year’s playoff series between the Rockets and Jazz when the same thing happened. Unfortunately, I turned out to be right as the Jazz scored 37 points in the fourth and scored on their last 13 possessions to beat Houston 97-89 at Toyota Center Sunday night.
It has become too familiar of a theme lately against Utah. The Jazz are to the Rockets at Toyota Center as Tiger Woods is to other golfers at the Buick Invitational at Torrey Pines.
It was up to the other Rockets to pick up the slack, and in the first half, that didn’t happen. Houston shot a putrid 34% in the first half, with Tracy McGrady only making 1-of-8 shots in the first half. Rafer Alston was pathetic shooting (again), hitting only 2-of-8.
Alston’s ability to hit teardrops in the lane has suddenly disappeared again – he air-balled one in the first quarter. He also blew running the fast break a couple of times. For example, on a 4-on-1 fast break, he gave the ball up too early to McGrady when he could have taken a couple of steps closer to the basket to draw the only defender to him, then dishing to McGrady at the last second for an easy layup. Instead, his early pass botched the break. As a team, the Rockets also had way too many turnovers by halftime – 9.
Carl Landry, getting more minutes because of Yao’s absence, was active as usual. But Utah did a good job of getting in his face and contesting his shots deep in the paint. Give credit to Utah defense — Landry was only 1-of-5 from the field in the first half, but he did go to the line 4 times and made 3 of them.
Shane Battier and Luis Scola took on more of a scoring role in Yao’s absence, with both hitting 3-of-5 shots to have 7 points each at halftime. Aaron Brooks was the lone bright spot in the Houston backcourt, hitting 2-of-3 three-pointers for 6 points.
Utah’s shooting wasn’t much better, shooting only 41% on their way to a 41-35 halftime lead. But the Rockets still gave up too many easy baskets, letting the Jazz score on at least 2 or 3 alley-oops.
However, Scola and Landry were fairly active in the middle, which was one dimension the Rockets missed having in last season’s playoff series: players at the power forward position who could score and give the Jazz fits inside along with Yao. By that fact alone, I remained bullish about the Rockets chances in the second half.
Unfortunately, the offense continued to stay terrible at the start of the third quarter, with the Rockets missing their first 7 shots.
But then McGrady got going, hitting 4-of-8 shots in the third quarter, although Adelman knew it was going to take more than McGrady to give the Jazz fits defensively, so he finally (and wisely) gave Steve Novak some playing time. And did it pay off!
In just 4 minutes of play, Novak hit a baseline jumper at the buzzer, a long two-pointer at the top of the key, and two 3-pointers to score a career-high 10 points. It was one of the most electric scenes I’ve seen at Toyota Center in a very long time. The crowd knew that this was Novak’s chance to show what he could do, so every time he put up a shot, you could hear the buzz as he got ready to launch his shots. And when he drained all 4 of his shots, you had to love the reaction not only from the crowd, but from the Houston bench. They all rose from their feet and danced in jubilation as their long-awaited sharpshooter delivered the goods in a real game.
Because of McGrady and Novak lighting it up in the third, the Jazz only led 60-59 entering the fourth quarter. At the start of the fourth, I had to give coach Rick Adelman credit for not putting Alston or Luther Head back into the game, and rewarding Aaron Brooks, Novak, Landry and Scola for their energy by keeping them in the game for at least the first half of the fourth quarter.
Although Houston hit a respectable 11-of-18 shots in the fourth quarter led by McGrady’s 5-of-8 shooting, he was 1-of-4 from three-point land (and 1-of-7 overall…remember what I have been saying about the relationship between the number of 3-point attempts McGrady shoots and Houston’s ability to win?)
Scola also went to the line 8 times in the fourth quarter, but only made 5 of those free throw attempts. McGrady was 0-for-2 from the line, although those FTs were attempted after he had injured his hand falling out of bounds after being fouled.
On the other end of the floor, Houston couldn’t stop the Jazz. The Jazz’s brilliant front office acquisition of Kyle Korver a few weeks ago paid off big-time, with Korver hitting 3-of-5 three-pointers in the fourth quarter – many of them wide open. Ironically, if the Rockets’ Novak hadn’t showed what he could do on Sunday from 3-point range, then you can bet there would be many Rocket fans wondering why Houston couldn’t have acquired Korver to get that outside threat.
However, it wasn’t that great of a night for Novak on the defensive end of the court. On one play in the fourth quarter, Novak fell down out of bounds and was slow to get back into the action on the court, which left Andrei Kirilenko wide-open for a layup. He also was responsible for leaving Korver open on two of his late 3-pointers that were absolute daggers to the Rockets’ chances.
It will be interesting to see if Adelman thinks those defensive lapses were enough to keep Novak out of future games. I hope not. I know Jeff Van Gundy would have. JVG gave up on Novak last year because of similar situations, thus not giving him the chance to improve defensively like Scola has done this year through more playing time.
Utah’s Derron Williams had 6 points and 8 assists in the fourth quarter alone, showing the difference between the Rockets’ starting point guard and Houston’s is still huge. Williams is just money down the stretch.
On the other hand, I thought Rafer Alston made the worst decision at the most critical juncture of the game. With the Jazz leading 85-77 with 3:04 remaining, the Rockets still had a chance if they could score on a high-percentage shot. Instead, he jacked up a 3-pointer that clanged off the rim. On Utah’s ensuing possession, Korver hit a 3-pointer to push the Jazz lead to 88-77, and that was the ballgame.
Alston finished with 8 points on terrible 4-of-13 shooting, missing all 4 of his 3-point attempts. McGrady finished with 21 points on 10-of-24 shooting (1-of-7 from 3-point land) and was 0-of-3 from the line. Scola had 18 points on 6-of-12 shooting, although he shot 6-of-12 from the charity stripe as well. Not good against a team where every point counts.
Shane Battier stepped up by hitting 6-of-9 shots (3-of-5 from the 3-point line) to score 15 points. But the brightest star was Novak, who scored 10 points on 4-of-4 shooting, and more importantly, gives Adelman confidence that he deserves more playing time, especially when Yao is back in the lineup drawing double-teams. They could absolutely use Novak on Tuesday when they play the undersized Golden State Warriors, who are sure to collapse down on Yao and leave perimeter shooters open.
Now if only the Rockets’ starting point guard can get Novak the ball rather than shoot 3-pointers himself. Speaking of point guards, I absolutely loved how Aaron Brooks blew past Derron Williams with 7 minutes remaining in the fourth quarter to score a layup off the glass! It’s so sweet to see a really good opposing point guard have to defend a threat like Brooks who can’t be guarded, and giving him a taste of his own medicine.





January 28th, 2008 at 1:36 am
It’s crazy how quickly some fans forget. Tracy McGrady leads the Rockets to a 20-12 record without Yao and there’s no way the Rockets are a better team without him(and long time Rockets fans agreed). Yao leads the Rockets to a 7-7 record without Tracy and there’s talk that they don’t need him anymore. LMAO!!!!! So 1 game proves their relative values??? LMAO if that’s not bias I don’t know what is. Reminds me of a thread where a “fan” wanted the Rockets to lose because Yao wasn’t playing. Check their overall record without McGrady and then check it without Yao before making gleaful generalizations.
That being said, we were missing Yao tonight. I don’t know how many layups Hayes, Scola, and Landry blew. Add that to all the missed FT’s and it’s a wonder we didn’t lose by 30.
Anyway, you’re absolutely right that JVG wouldn’t have given Novak much PT because of exactly what happened. I was at the game, and after Korver hit the 1st 3 from the corner there was a collective groan when he got open again. Yeah, Novak had a great night, but what good is scoring 14 points if you’re going to give up that many in the 4th quarter of a close game??? Also, what was Adelman thinking leaving Novak in the game to start the 4th without Tracy McGrady. Novak is useless if there’s nobody creating shots for him. I think all but 1 of his baskets was assists by T-Mac. Not a smart decision on RA’s part taking apart the lineup that had gotten the Rockets back into the game. He showed faith down the stretch in the lineup that closed out Portland so what changed??? Sadly, Novak will probably never learn to play D because it isn’t something Adelman emphasizes, and that’s a shame because I was watching him warm up and the guy just does not miss
Actually, I think Adelman did keep the same players in the game at the start of the fourth quarter who had gotten them back into the game in the third, except for McGrady (I believe) who needed the rest for the stretch run. I had to give Adelman credit for sticking with Novak, Brooks, and Scola. — John
January 28th, 2008 at 2:37 am
How is Yao’s upper respiratory infection going? Is it serious or will he be back next game?
Don’t know, but I would be shocked if Yao doesn’t play Tuesday. I don’t remember an upper respiratory infection keeping a player out for more than a couple of days, max. — John.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:00 am
John how can you give Adelman credit for leaving Novak in without McGrady??? Steve can’t create any shots for himself. He should have played Bonzi because at least he can pose a mismatch.
Rather than go with Bonzi, Novak was hot and they needed his outside shooting. It would have been nice to have had both of them in there, though. Unfortunately, Novak didn’t get many touches in the fourth quarter for whatever reason. That was a shame. I think McGrady needed a rest at the beginning of the fourth quarter, which isn’t unusual, because he had played almost the entire third quarter, I think. — John
January 28th, 2008 at 2:19 pm
i agree that we do miss Yao’s 22 points a game and that we do have a better chance of winning with Yao than without.
Yao’s defensive presence in the lane? LMAO. comon, you’ve gotta be kidding me
ask yourself: isnt it more like, free jumpers after jumpers for Boozer and Okur? didn’t we have enough of it in last yr’s playoff run? i’m not even going to bring up Kurt Thomas.. and we sure missed Yao’s defensive presence against portland in the last 7:30 of the fourth quarter when we made a run to beat portland by 10??
its not Yao’s fault, he’s just can’t move fast. but it is what it is.
its one thing to support Yao, as we all do, but we also gotta be real to ourselves.
and what’s the point of starting off this article claiming Yao’s more important than Tmac?? its so pointless.
its almost like you were hoping that the Rockets would lose to prove Yao’s worth..
to be honest with you John, reading your one-sided, bias articles here makes me feel depressed for being a fan of Yao. we are better than that…
Some of you guys need to read my posts more carefully before posting. I never said Yao was better than McGrady. It is an indisputable fact that there are still many people who want to make it a point that Yao is better than McGrady, and that McGrady should be traded, and I have never taken either side because that’s pointless. Here’s what I wrote verbatim:
“There may have been a lot of debate a couple of weeks ago if the Rockets were better off without Tracy McGrady when the Rockets won more games than they lost when he was out with an injury. However, there is absolutely no way that discussion has any merit when it comes to Yao Ming being out, as Rocket fans saw Sunday night against the Utah Jazz.”
Regarding Yao’s defense, the Jazz got alot more easy buckets around the basket that Yao could have altered (like the 2 or 3 alley-oops, D. Williams taking it to the rack countless times). I didn’t say anything about the defense that Yao provides outside the lane, and that’s not really where the Jazz killed the Rockets — it was either inside where he usually is, or outside around the 3-point line where Yao doesn’t play anyway. — John
January 29th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
I found this Link on espn.com, it’s time to package McGrady and Alston to the trade block.
http://blogs.chron.com/jeromesolomon/2008/01/its_time_rockets_and_rafer_als.html
Yeah, I saw it earlier, too. It’s actually on the Houston Chronicle site, but we know what you mean. Jerome Solomon is much more assertive in calling out the Rockets to make changes as opposed to his colleague Jonathan Feigen. I kind of like that. — John