| Author |
Message |
< Non-Yao stuff ~ China Once Again Accused of Currency Manipulation !!! |
|
pryuen
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:33 pm |
|
|
 Posts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
|
[quote="Dr. No"] [quote="temuchin"] He has simply said QE2 hasn't done what YOU claim it's done.
again, you have shown that you can't read
[quote="Pryuen"] [size=109][color=red]QE2 has been a failure[/color] [/size]
[quote="Pryuen"][size=109]yeah, QE2 has [color=red]saved[/color] over 50,000 jobs in Calif[/size]
[size=117][color=red]WHICH PART YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND, DOUCHEBAG???[/color] 
[color=darkred]You're the [/color][color=red]ONLY ONE [/color][color=darkred]that kept saying QEs had been a [/color][color=red]SUCCESS[/color] [color=darkred]and had created jobs, improving unemployment/underemployment situation and reviving the economy.[/color]
[color=red]You CAN'T EVEN distinguish the difference between SAVED to CREATED jobs. [/color]
[color=red]YEAH.....QEs had been an OVERWHELMING SUCCESS[/color] [color=darkred]in filling the pockets of the 1% of the Super Rich/Jewish bankers with extra liquidity/cash, but [/color][color=red]DID NOTHING[/color] [color=darkred]to help to create aggregate demand, stimulate consumer spendings or lending to private sectors/small businesses for expansion and hiring, in order to enhance unemployment/underemployment situation, and reviving economy. [/color]  [/size]
|
|
Top
|
 
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:03 am |
|
|
 Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
man, talk about scapegoating.
first the old fart blames QE2, a US economic policy for the rising cost of living in the backward Chinese city that he lives in.
then these gems [quote="Pryuen"][size=109]yeah, QE2 has [color=red]saved[/color] over 50,000 jobs in Calif[/size]
[quote="pryuen"][size=117][color=red]YEAH.....QEs had been an OVERWHELMING SUCCESS[/color] [color=darkred]in filling the pockets of the 1% of the Super Rich/Jewish bankers with extra liquidity/cash, but [/color][color=red]DID NOTHING[/color] [color=darkred]to help to create aggregate demand, stimulate consumer spendings or lending to private sectors/small businesses for expansion and hiring, in order to enhance unemployment/underemployment situation, and reviving economy. [/color] [/size] way to publicize your ignorance.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
pryuen
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:13 am |
|
|
| Posts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
|
[quote="Dr. No"]
then these gems [list][quote="Pryuen"][size=109]yeah, QE2 has [color=red]saved[/color] over 50,000 jobs in Calif[/size]
[size=117][color=red]YOU STILL CAN'T DIFFERENTIATE SAVED VERSUS CREATE !!! [/color]
[color=red]WHAT'S THE USE [/color][color=darkred]of saving 50,000 jobs in California, [/color][color=red]WHILE MORE [/color][color=darkred]people lost their jobs, and[/color] [color=red]OVER tens of millions people in under-employment and unemployment????
YOU'RE MORE STUPID that I thought you're.[/color] [/size]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:16 am |
|
|
| Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
[quote="pryuen"][size=117] [color=darkred]in filling the pockets of the 1% of the Super Rich/Jewish bankers with extra liquidity/cash, but [/color] [/size] ah the danger of parroting.
your regurgiatating WASP rhetorics, propagated by the resident WASP worshipper Voyd. you make it sound like that
- there are no WASP in the 1% of the super rich and
- WASP bankers did not reap the same benefits that Jewish bankers do
there are more WASPs in the upper 1% than any other demographic group. there are more WASP bankers than there are Jewish bankers. but the WASPs rhetorics would have people to believe that only the Jews are involved.
it is a replay of Voyd's blaming the Jews for the Opium War, as if the WASPs were not involved.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:19 am |
|
|
| Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
[quote="pryuen"][size=117][color=red] WHAT'S THE USE [/color][color=darkred]of saving 50,000 jobs in California, [/color][color=red] WHILE MORE [/color][color=darkred]people lost their jobs, and[/color] [color=red] OVER tens of millions people in under-employment and unemployment????.[/color] [/size]
if not for QE2, there would 50,000 more jobs lost.
why are you so stupid, old fart ?
do you even understand what saving jobs mean ? 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
pryuen
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:46 am |
|
|
| Posts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
|
[size=117][color=darkred]To help you out, douchebag, these are [/color][color=red]the definitions of CREATE and SAVE.[/color][/size]
[quote]
[size=109][color=red][b]cre
|
|
Top
|
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:00 am |
|
|
| Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
[quote="pryuen"][size=117][color=red]The unemployment rate at the reign of George W Bush was hovering around 6% average.[/color][/size] there you go again, being intellectually dishonest, too afraid to hold a WASP accountable.
you make it sound like W was competent.
why are yo so afraid of holding a WASP responsible ?
.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:07 am |
|
|
| Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
[quote="pryuen"]
[quote][size=109][color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2008[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2008 - 4.9%
February 2008 - 4.8%
March 2008 - 5.1%
April 2008 - 5%
May 2008 - 5.5%
June 2008 - 5.6%
July 2008 - 5.8%
August 2008 - 6.2%
September 2008 - 6.2%
October 2008 - 6.6%
November 2008 - 6.8%
December 2008 - 7.2% [/color][/size] thank you for providing telling statisctic pointing to W's incompetence, but you're too afraid to call him out because he is a WASP
anyone who know economics knows that employment data are lagging indicators. it takes alot to generate a 50% increase in the unemployement rate in one year, which is what W did in his last year.
in W's last year there was a 50% increase in unemployment % signaling a strong trend for the worst.
Obama inherited a mess, and had done his best to reverse that trend, stopping the bleeding and stablizing.
under O, the unemployement rate has never increased by 50% in a year, like it was during W's last year.
old fart, why are you so afraid to hold the WASP W accountable for this mess ?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
pryuen
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:27 am |
|
|
| Posts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
|
[quote="Dr. No"]
[size=109]there you go again, [color=red]being intellectually dishonest[/color], too afraid to hold a WASP accountable.
you make it sound like W was competent.
why are yo so afraid of holding a WASP responsible ?.[/size]
[color=red][size=150]FVCK YOU !!!![/size] [size=117]Douchebag.[/size]   [/color]
[size=117][color=darkred]Go and check the unemployment rate of GWB's 8 year's reign, and you'll know other than the Year 2008, [/color][color=red]GWB Administration had been doing MUCH A BETTER AND EFFICIENT JOB IN ECONOMICS than the Obama Administration[/color] [color=darkred]and was able to control the unemployment rate [/color] [color=red]BELOW 6% MOST OF THE TIME.[/color][/size]
[quote]
[size=109][color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2001[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2001 - 4.2%
February 2001 - 4.2%
March 2001 - 4.3%
April 2001 - 4.4%
May 2001 - 4.3%
June 2001 - 4.5%
July 2001 - 4.6%
August 2001 - 4.9%
September 2001 - 5%
October 2001 - 5.3%
November 2001 - 5.5%
December 2001 - 5.7%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2002[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2002 - 5.7%
February 2002 - 5.7%
March 2002 - 5.7%
April 2002 - 5.9%
May 2002 - 5.8%
June 2002 - 5.8%
July 2002 - 5.8%
August 2002 - 5.7%
September 2002 - 5.7%
October 2002 - 5.7%
November 2002 - 5.9%
December 2002 - 6%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2003[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2003 - 5.8%
February 2003 - 5.9%
March 2003 - 5.9%
April 2003 - 6%
May 2003 - 6.1%
June 2003 - 6.3%
July 2003 - 6.2%
August 2003 - 6.1%
September 2003 - 6.1%
October 2003 - 6%
November 2003 - 5.8%
December 2003 - 5.7%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2004[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2004 - 5.7%
February 2004 - 5.6%
March 2004 - 5.8%
April 2004 - 5.6%
May 2004 - 5.6%
June 2004 - 5.6%
July 2004 - 5.5%
August 2004 - 5.4%
September 2004 - 5.4%
October 2004 - 5.5%
November 2004 - 5.4%
December 2004 - 5.4%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2005[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2005 - 5.2%
February 2005 - 5.4%
March 2005 - 5.2%
April 2005 - 5.2%
May 2005 - 5.1%
June 2005 - 5.1%
July 2005 - 5%
August 2005 - 4.9%
September 2005 - 5%
October 2005 - 5%
November 2005 - 5%
December 2005 - 4.8%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2006[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2006 - 4.7%
February 2006 - 4.8%
March 2006 - 4.7%
April 2006 - 4.7%
May 2006 - 4.7%
June 2006 - 4.6%
July 2006 - 4.7%
August 2006 - 4.7%
September 2006 - 4.5%
October 2006 - 4.4%
November 2006 - 4.5%
December 2006 - 4.4%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2007[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2007 - 4.6%
February 2007 - 4.5%
March 2007 - 4.4%
April 2007 - 4.5%
May 2007 - 4.5%
June 2007 - 4.6%
July 2007 - 4.7%
August 2007 - 4.7%
September 2007 - 4.7%
October 2007 - 4.8%
November 2007 - 4.7%
December 2007 - 4.9%[/color]
[color=red]Unemployment Rates in 2008[/color]
[color=darkred]January 2008 - 4.9%
February 2008 - 4.8%
March 2008 - 5.1%
April 2008 - 5%
May 2008 - 5.5%
June 2008 - 5.6%
July 2008 - 5.8%
August 2008 - 6.2%
September 2008 - 6.2%
October 2008 - 6.6%
November 2008 - 6.8%
December 2008 - 7.2%[/color] [/size]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
Dr. No
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:56 am |
|
|
| Posts: 12457Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
|
[quote="pryuen"][color=red][size=150]FVCK YOU !!!![/size] [size=117].[/size] [/color] is that the best you can do, old fart, waving your white flag of surrender ?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
