Author Message

<  Jeremy Lin  ~  Jeremy Lin & Nets Off season Thread

PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:54 am
Posts: 4644Location: NJ/NY Metro AreaJoined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 1:07 pm
Dr. No wrote:
the phrase means " intuitively obvious :!: "



the literal translation
    when you draw a picture of a person,
    you don't have to draw their intestines :!:


Well, you'll have to draw some intestines for me, because I don't see what makes this trade something that the Nets were desperate to do. Again...were they desperate to trade Lopez? Desperate to sign Mozgov? Desperate to get someone to play with Lin? What was the desperation that motivated them to take this lazy player?


Offline Profile YIM
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:02 am
User avatarPosts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
PhilNYC wrote:

Why is it so important to you to convince everyone that Russell is lazy and the Nets are desperate? What are the Nets desperate about? Are you saying they are desperate to replace Lin? Desperate to trade Lopez? Desperate to take on Mozgov's contract? Desperate to sign a lazy player? Not sure what this trade solves in terms of desperation.


And I just LOLed at Canto Moranus whho must be once again pulled ***** from his @R$E saying Brooklyn Nets originally preferred Brandon Ingham over D'Angelo Russell !!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

JESUS CHRIST !!!
:roll: :roll: :roll:

Brooklyn Nets had been WEAK in position 2 i.e. the shooting guard position (where they have the immature Sean Kilpatrick and the old Randy Foye), and NOT position 3 i.e. the small forward position, where they have already 2 young players with potential: Chris LeVert and Rondae Hollis Jefferson.

Brandon Ingham's natural position is a small forward !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:

WHY OVERLOADING the small forward position by bringing in Brandon Ingham, and NEGLECTING to strengthen the shooting guard position ???
:roll: :roll: :roll:

Dr. No wrote:

let's be honest.

Nets would much prefer LAL's other #2 pick, Brandon Ingram,
who actually has shown vision, skills and the work ethics to be successful against NBA competition. He is versatile, can score inside, mid range and outside, can defend 1-4, and has earned the trust of his coaches to bring the ball up to the front court. when asked to be the point forward, he has shown better play-making skills than lazy D

btw, Ingram is one year younger than lazy D

the only reason the Nets didn't get Ingram was Magic Johnson would not even discuss it.

the fact that the Nets were willing to settle for lazy D underscores how desperate they are :!:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:08 am
User avatarPosts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
Dr. No wrote:

PRY cutting n pasting info from the internet pretending that he has the inside info, when he can't even see the BIG picture :!: :roll:



YEAH..... and you're an INSIDER that KNEW that ORIGINALLY Brooklyn Nets wanted to have Brandon Ingham such that Brooklyn Nets would have OVERLOADED the small forward position, but continue to neglect to strengthen the shooting guard position !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:11 am
User avatarPosts: 12436Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
PhilNYC wrote:
Dr. No wrote:
the phrase means " intuitively obvious :!: "

the literal translation
    when you draw a picture of a person,
    you don't have to draw their intestines :!:


Well, you'll have to draw some intestines for me, because I don't see what makes this trade something that the Nets were desperate to do.


i know that u know the answer,
    you just don't want to say it :!:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:17 am
User avatarPosts: 12436Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
pryuen wrote:
Dr. No wrote:
PRY cutting n pasting info from the internet pretending that he has the inside info, when he can't even see the BIG picture :!: :roll:
YEAH..... and you're an INSIDER that KNEW that ORIGINALLY Brooklyn Nets wanted to have Brandon Ingham such that Brooklyn Nets would have OVERLOADED the small forward position, but continue to neglect to strengthen the shooting guard position !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:
画 公 仔 唔 使 画 出 肠 :!:

Nets want young elite talent :!:

on that basis, assuming that they're all available,
    who to get, Ingram or Lazy D :?: :roll: :roll:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:27 am
User avatarPosts: 15605Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 1:31 pm
Lakers dumped D'Lo for cap space and correct MITCH's mistake.

Nets was there to get it. Lopez has 1 year left on his contract. Mozgov has 2 more years.

Nets got offered a Free Meal and Moranus asking why there is no Lobster.

While Lakers fans think they'll be contending next season are DELUSIONAL.

Ingram will not be good next season either.


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:51 am
User avatarPosts: 59329Location: Hong Kong/ChinaJoined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 5:13 am
Dr. No wrote:

pryuen wrote:

Dr. No wrote:
PRY cutting n pasting info from the internet pretending that he has the inside info, when he can't even see the BIG picture :!: :roll:


YEAH..... and you're an INSIDER that KNEW that ORIGINALLY Brooklyn Nets wanted to have Brandon Ingham such that Brooklyn Nets would have OVERLOADED the small forward position, but continue to neglect to strengthen the shooting guard position !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:


画 公 仔 唔 使 画 出 肠 :!:

Nets want young elite talent :!:

on that basis, assuming that they're all available,
    who to get, Ingram or Lazy D :?: :roll: :roll:


LOL !!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Canto LOGIC
still trying to convince others that D'Angelo Russell is a GOOD-FOR-NOTHING LAZY BONE !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:14 am
User avatarPosts: 12436Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
Malorkayel wrote:
Nets got offered a Free Meal; Mozgov has 2 more years.
:lol: :lol:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:17 am
User avatarPosts: 12436Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:27 pm
pryuen wrote:
Dr. No wrote:
画 公 仔 唔 使 画 出 肠 :!: Nets want young elite talent :!:

on that basis, assuming that they're all available,
    who to get, Ingram or Lazy D :?: :roll: :roll:
Canto LOGIC still trying to convince others that D'Angelo Russell is a GOOD-FOR-NOTHING LAZY BONE !!! :roll: :roll: :roll:
Bingo,
    PRY is scared sh itless of directly answering my questions :!: :mrgreen:


Offline Profile
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:35 am
User avatarPosts: 15605Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2003 1:31 pm
Dr. No wrote:
Malorkayel wrote:
Nets got offered a Free Meal; Mozgov has 2 more years.
:lol: :lol:



LOL, Lakers still have DENG's shtty contract. Who's laughing?

MITCH got fired for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luol_Deng

Quote:
Los Angeles Lakers (2016–present)


On July 7, 2016, Deng signed a four-year, $72 million contract with the Los Angeles Lakers.[45] On March 15, 2017, the Lakers shut down a healthy Deng for the rest of the season to give the majority of playing time over the final 15 games to the team's younger players.[46]


Deng 7 ppg, 39% FG, 30% 3pt, 5 reb. 3 years left at $18mil per.

Lets talk about LAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Offline Profile

Display posts from previous:  Sort by:

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
Page 10 of 18
174 posts
Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 18  Next
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
Search for:
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum